Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦260 mm/s⁩ ⁦200 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer ⁦4096 KB⁩ ⁦64 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line⁩ ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by commands dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number — ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory — ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417 (USB + LAN version)⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦184 × 140 × 142 mm⁩
Weight ⁦0.84 kg⁩ —
Body Material ABS ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter Partial Auto Cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS
Interface USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations USB + Serial / USB + LAN
SDK Support — iOS, Android and Windows SDK
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-Q809K⁩ ⁦XP-V320N⁩
Features
QR Code Printing Yes Yes
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦260 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦200 mm/s⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Interface: USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations vs USB + Serial / USB + LAN

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N if you need:

  • Column Capacity: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by commands dots/line⁩ vs ⁦576 dots/line⁩
  • Power Adapter Input: ⁦AC 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ vs ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
  • Dimensions: ⁦184 × 140 × 142 mm⁩ vs ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
  • Supported OS: Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS vs Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N on Column Capacity and Power Adapter Input. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K remains the better pick if your priority is سرعة الطباعة. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Print Width.

The main decisive differences: سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦260 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N: ⁦200 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦4096 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N: ⁦64 KB⁩); Column Capacity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦576 dots/line⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by commands dots/line⁩); Power Adapter Input (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N: ⁦AC 110/220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩); Dimensions (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N: ⁦184 × 140 × 142 mm⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K suits needs centered on سرعة الطباعة, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-V320N fits priorities around Column Capacity. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp