Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Line Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ ⁦80 mm⁩
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ —
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation — ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦200 mm/s⁩ ⁦230 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution ⁦203 dpi⁩ —
Input Buffer ⁦96 KB⁩ ⁦64 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity — ⁦512 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input — ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦195×140×142.5 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦194.5×145×147 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.1 kg⁩ ⁦1.45 kg⁩
Body Material — ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ 10–80 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter — Yes
Connectivity
Supported OS Linux Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS
Interface Ethernet or Serial + USB USB + Serial or USB + Ethernet
SDK Support — iOS, Android, Windows
Certifications
Certifications — CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Order Coming Alert — Yes
QR Code Printing — Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-Q200II⁩ ⁦XP-S200H⁩
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty — ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II if you need:

  • Input Buffer: ⁦96 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦1.1 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.45 kg⁩
  • Storage Humidity: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ vs 10–80 %

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦230 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦200 mm/s⁩
  • Supported OS: Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS vs Linux

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II on Input Buffer and Weight. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H remains the better pick if your priority is سرعة الطباعة. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Maximum Paper Roll Diameter.

The main decisive differences: سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II: ⁦200 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H: ⁦230 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II: ⁦96 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H: ⁦64 KB⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II: ⁦1.1 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H: ⁦1.45 kg⁩); Storage Humidity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H: 10–80 %); Supported OS (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II: Linux, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H: Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200II suits needs centered on Input Buffer, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-S200H fits priorities around سرعة الطباعة. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
$45.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp