Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ ⁦80 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS —
سرعة الطباعة ⁦260 mm/s⁩ ⁦300 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution ⁦203 dpi⁩ ⁦203 dpi⁩
Input Buffer ⁦64 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line or 512 dots/line⁩ —
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
GB18030 Character Set Support Yes Yes
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input — ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦192×140×140 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦182.5×140.5×139 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.12 kg⁩ ⁦0.96 kg⁩
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩
Reliability
Auto Cutter Full or partial auto cutter —
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes —
Connectivity
Supported OS ⁦Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Linux⁩ Linux
Interface ⁦9-pin Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩ ⁦9-pin Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩
SDK Support Android, iOS —
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Error Alarm Support Yes —
QR Code Printing Yes Yes
Logo Download and Printing Yes —
General
Model ⁦XP-N260H⁩ ⁦XP-Q260III⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H if you need:

  • Supported OS: ⁦Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Linux⁩ vs Linux

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦300 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦260 mm/s⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦0.96 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.12 kg⁩

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III on سرعة الطباعة and Input Buffer. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H remains the better pick if your priority is Supported OS. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Maximum Paper Roll Diameter.

The main decisive differences: سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H: ⁦260 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦300 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H: ⁦64 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H: ⁦1.12 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦0.96 kg⁩); Supported OS (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H: ⁦Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Linux⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: Linux).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N260H suits needs centered on Supported OS, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III fits priorities around سرعة الطباعة. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp