Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter — ⁦80 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS —
سرعة الطباعة ⁦300 mm/s⁩ ⁦300 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution — ⁦203 dpi⁩
Input Buffer ⁦2048 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ —
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
GB18030 Character Set Support — Yes
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ —
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦182.5×140.5×139 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.16 kg⁩ ⁦0.96 kg⁩
Body Material ABS —
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–80 % ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter —
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS Linux
Interface USB + Serial + Ethernet ⁦9-pin Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩
SDK Support iOS, Android, Windows —
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS —
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Order Coming Alert Yes —
QR Code Printing Yes Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-E300M⁩ ⁦XP-Q260III⁩
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ —

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M if you need:

  • Print Width: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ vs ⁦72 mm⁩
  • Supported OS: Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS vs Linux

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III if you need:

  • Media Width: ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ vs ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦2048 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦0.96 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.16 kg⁩
  • Storage Humidity: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ vs 10–80 %

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III on Media Width and Input Buffer. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M remains the better pick if your priority is Print Width. They share تقنية الطباعة and سرعة الطباعة. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, سرعة الطباعة, Line Spacing.

The main decisive differences: Media Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M: ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩); Print Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦72 mm⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M: ⁦2048 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M: ⁦1.16 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦0.96 kg⁩); Storage Humidity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M: 10–80 %, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E300M suits needs centered on Print Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q260III fits priorities around Media Width. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock
$45.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp