Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1 within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩ ⁦58 / 80 / 83±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ —
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ —
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦48–80±0.5 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS compatible —
سرعة الطباعة ⁦200 mm/s⁩ ⁦300 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer ⁦64 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line or 512 dots/line⁩ ⁦576 dots/line or 512 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦80 mm paper: Font A 42 or 48 columns; Font B 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦12×24 dots⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦9×17 dots⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦24×24 dots⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC437 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODABAR, ITF, CODE39, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 110V/220V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦140×130×133 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.16 kg⁩ ⁦1.02 kg⁩
Body Material ABS ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–90 % 10–90 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦100 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes Yes
Connectivity
Supported OS ⁦Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux⁩ —
Interface USB + Serial USB + Scanner or USB + Bluetooth + Scanner
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS —
General
Model ⁦XP-E200M⁩ ⁦XP-R1⁩
Features
QR Code Printing Yes Yes

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M if you need:

  • Print Width: ⁦72 mm⁩ vs ⁦48–80±0.5 mm⁩
  • Font A Size: ⁦12×24 dots⁩ vs ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
  • Font B Size: ⁦9×17 dots⁩ vs ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
  • Chinese Font Size: ⁦24×24 dots⁩ vs ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1 if you need:

  • Media Width: ⁦58 / 80 / 83±0.5 mm⁩ vs ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦300 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦200 mm/s⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Column Number: ⁦80 mm paper: Font A 42 or 48 columns; Font B 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese 21 or 24 columns⁩ vs ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1 on Media Width and سرعة الطباعة. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M remains the better pick if your priority is Print Width. They share تقنية الطباعة and Column Capacity. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1 share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Column Capacity, Line Spacing.

The main decisive differences: Media Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1: ⁦58 / 80 / 83±0.5 mm⁩); Print Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦72 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1: ⁦48–80±0.5 mm⁩); سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦200 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1: ⁦300 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦64 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Column Number (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1: ⁦80 mm paper: Font A 42 or 48 columns; Font B 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese 21 or 24 columns⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M suits needs centered on Print Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-R1 fits priorities around Media Width. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock
$45.00 in stock
$65.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp