Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Line Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩ ⁦57.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ ⁦60 mm⁩
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦48 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS compatible ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦200 mm/s⁩ ⁦120 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution — ⁦203 dpi⁩
Input Buffer ⁦64 KB⁩ ⁦128 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line or 512 dots/line⁩ —
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ —
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦4 MB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦12×24 dots⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm⁩
Font B Size ⁦9×17 dots⁩ —
Chinese Font Size ⁦24×24 dots⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm⁩
Character Set ⁦PC437 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
GB18030 Character Set Support — Yes
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODABAR, ITF, CODE39, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ —
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 110V/220V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦DC 12V/2.6A⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ —
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 12V/2.6A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 12V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦169.95×120×119.92 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.16 kg⁩ ⁦0.80 kg⁩
Body Material ABS —
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % ⁦10–80, non-condensing %⁩
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–90 % 10–90 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter Automatic cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦100 km⁩ ⁦50 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes —
Connectivity
Supported OS ⁦Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux⁩ Windows, Linux, Android, Apple
Interface USB + Serial Standard: USB, USB + Bluetooth, USB + Wi-Fi, USB + Ethernet; optional: USB + Serial, USB + Parallel
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS —
General
Model ⁦XP-E200M⁩ ⁦XP-Q90EC⁩
Features
QR Code Printing Yes —

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M if you need:

  • Maximum Paper Roll Diameter: ⁦80 mm⁩ vs ⁦60 mm⁩
  • Print Width: ⁦72 mm⁩ vs ⁦48 mm⁩
  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦200 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦120 mm/s⁩
  • NV Flash Memory: ⁦256 KB⁩ vs ⁦4 MB⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC if you need:

  • Input Buffer: ⁦128 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦0.80 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.16 kg⁩
  • Operating Humidity: ⁦10–80, non-condensing %⁩ vs 10–80 %
  • Interface: Standard: USB, USB + Bluetooth, USB + Wi-Fi, USB + Ethernet; optional: USB + Serial, USB + Parallel vs USB + Serial

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M on Maximum Paper Roll Diameter and Print Width. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC remains the better pick if your priority is Input Buffer. They share تقنية الطباعة and Paper Thickness. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Paper Thickness, Line Spacing.

The main decisive differences: Maximum Paper Roll Diameter (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦80 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC: ⁦60 mm⁩); Print Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦72 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC: ⁦48 mm⁩); سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦200 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC: ⁦120 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦64 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC: ⁦128 KB⁩); NV Flash Memory (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦256 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC: ⁦4 MB⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M suits needs centered on Maximum Paper Roll Diameter, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q90EC fits priorities around Input Buffer. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock
$45.00 in stock
$65.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp