Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Line Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter — ⁦80 mm⁩
Paper Thickness — ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS —
سرعة الطباعة ⁦200 mm/s⁩ ⁦200 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution — ⁦203 dpi⁩
Input Buffer ⁦128 KB⁩ ⁦96 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ —
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ —
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ —
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦192×140×140 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦190×140×131 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.12 kg⁩ ⁦1.03 kg⁩
Body Material ABS —
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–90 % ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter —
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, Mac, OPOS —
Interface USB + Ethernet or USB + Serial; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi ⁦Standard: USB + 9-pin Serial or USB + Ethernet; Optional: USB + Bluetooth or USB + Wi-Fi⁩
SDK Support iOS, Android, Windows —
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS —
Software
OPOS Support Yes —
General
Model ⁦XP-E200L⁩ ⁦XP-N160II⁩
Features
QR Code Printing Yes —
Logo Download and Printing — Yes
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ —

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L if you need:

  • Print Width: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ vs ⁦72 mm⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦128 KB⁩ vs ⁦96 KB⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II if you need:

  • Weight: ⁦1.03 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.12 kg⁩
  • Storage Humidity: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ vs 10–90 %

There is no clear technical winner between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II; the key decision axis is Print Width. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, سرعة الطباعة.

The main decisive differences: Print Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II: ⁦72 mm⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L: ⁦128 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II: ⁦96 KB⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L: ⁦1.12 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II: ⁦1.03 kg⁩); Storage Humidity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L: 10–90 %, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200L suits needs centered on Print Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-N160II fits priorities around Weight. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp Q851 L - 80MM⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q851-l-80mm
$50.00 in stock
$45.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp