Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ —
Print Width ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦300 mm/s⁩ ⁦260 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer ⁦2048 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ ⁦576 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ —
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 Kbytes⁩ —
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 110–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦144.5×146×188.5 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩ ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.44 kg⁩ ⁦0.84 kg⁩
Body Material ABS ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–90 % —
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, macOS, OPOS Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS
Interface USB + Serial + LAN USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations
SDK Support iOS, Android, Windows —
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Order Coming Alert Yes —
QR Code Printing Yes Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-D300M⁩ ⁦XP-Q809K⁩
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M if you need:

  • Print Width: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩ vs ⁦72 mm⁩
  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦300 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦260 mm/s⁩
  • Column Capacity: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ vs ⁦576 dots/line⁩
  • Power Adapter Input: ⁦AC 110–240V, 50–60Hz⁩ vs ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K if you need:

  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦2048 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦0.84 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.44 kg⁩
  • Interface: USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations vs USB + Serial + LAN

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M on Print Width and سرعة الطباعة. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K remains the better pick if your priority is Input Buffer. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Printer Emulation.

The main decisive differences: Print Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M: ⁦72 / 76 / 80 / 64 / 48 / 52 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦72 mm⁩); سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M: ⁦300 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦260 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M: ⁦2048 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Column Capacity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦576 dots/line⁩); Power Adapter Input (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M: ⁦AC 110–240V, 50–60Hz⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-D300M suits needs centered on Print Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K fits priorities around Input Buffer. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Xp-C260M⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-260
$60.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp