Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦260 mm/s⁩ ⁦260 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer ⁦64 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ ⁦576 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ —
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ —
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 110–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output — ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions — ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight — ⁦0.84 kg⁩
Body Material ABS ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–80 % —
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life — ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes —
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, macOS, OPOS Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS
Interface USB / Ethernet; optional Wi-Fi or Bluetooth USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations
SDK Support iOS, Android and Windows SDK —
Certifications
Certifications CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS, KC, SAA, BIS, BSMI CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-A260N⁩ ⁦XP-Q809K⁩
Features
QR Code Printing — Yes
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N if you need:

  • Column Capacity: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ vs ⁦576 dots/line⁩
  • Power Adapter Input: ⁦AC 110–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ vs ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
  • Supported OS: Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, macOS, OPOS vs Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS
  • Certifications: CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS, KC, SAA, BIS, BSMI vs CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K if you need:

  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N on Column Capacity and Power Adapter Input. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K remains the better pick if your priority is Input Buffer. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Print Width.

The main decisive differences: Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N: ⁦64 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Column Capacity (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N: ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦576 dots/line⁩); Power Adapter Input (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N: ⁦AC 110–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩); Supported OS (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N: Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, macOS, OPOS, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS); Certifications (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N: CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS, KC, SAA, BIS, BSMI, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260N suits needs centered on Column Capacity, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K fits priorities around Input Buffer. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
$65.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp