Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter — ⁦80 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation ESC/POS ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦260 mm/s⁩ ⁦260 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer — ⁦128 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩ ⁦576 dots/line, adjustable by command dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩ ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 110–220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦195 × 140 × 137.5 mm⁩ ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight — ⁦1.16 kg⁩
Body Material ABS ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life — ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes Yes
Connectivity
Supported OS Windows, JPOS, Linux, Android, macOS, OPOS Windows, JPOS, OPOS, Linux, Android, macOS
Interface USB + Serial + LAN USB or USB + Serial
SDK Support iOS, Android and Windows SDK iOS, Android, Windows
Certifications
Certifications — CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Order Coming Alert — Yes
QR Code Printing Yes Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-A260M⁩ ⁦XP-E260M⁩
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M if you need:

  • Media Width: ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ vs ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
  • Power Adapter Input: ⁦AC 110–220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ vs ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
  • Dimensions: ⁦195 × 140 × 137.5 mm⁩ vs ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M if you need:

  • SDK Support: iOS, Android, Windows vs iOS, Android and Windows SDK

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M on Media Width and Power Adapter Input. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M remains the better pick if your priority is SDK Support. They share تقنية الطباعة and Print Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Print Width, Printer Emulation.

The main decisive differences: Media Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M: ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M: ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩); Power Adapter Input (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M: ⁦AC 110–220 V, 50–60 Hz⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M: ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩); Dimensions (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M: ⁦195 × 140 × 137.5 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M: ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩); SDK Support (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M: iOS, Android and Windows SDK, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M: iOS, Android, Windows).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A260M suits needs centered on Media Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E260M fits priorities around SDK Support. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm⁩‎ - ‎⁨USB⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q80b-80mm
$35.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp