Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Line Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ —
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ —
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation — ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦200 mm/s⁩ ⁦260 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution ⁦203 dpi⁩ —
Input Buffer ⁦96 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity — ⁦576 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ —
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ —
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
GB18030 Character Set Support Yes —
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input — ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦184 × 140 × 135 mm⁩ ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.1 kg⁩ ⁦0.84 kg⁩
Body Material — ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ —
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes —
Connectivity
Supported OS Linux Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS
Interface USB / Ethernet / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi / USB + Ethernet / USB + Parallel / USB + Serial USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations
Certifications
Certifications — CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Software
OPOS Support Yes Yes
Features
Error Alarm Support Yes —
Order Coming Alert Yes —
QR Code Printing — Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-A160M⁩ ⁦XP-Q809K⁩
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty — ⁦12 months⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M if you need:

  • Dimensions: ⁦184 × 140 × 135 mm⁩ vs ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
  • Interface: USB / Ethernet / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi / USB + Ethernet / USB + Parallel / USB + Serial vs USB + Ethernet; USB + Serial + Ethernet; optional Bluetooth or Wi-Fi configurations

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦260 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦200 mm/s⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦96 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦0.84 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.1 kg⁩
  • Supported OS: Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS vs Linux

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K on سرعة الطباعة and Input Buffer. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M remains the better pick if your priority is Dimensions. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Print Width.

The main decisive differences: سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M: ⁦200 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦260 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M: ⁦96 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Dimensions (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M: ⁦184 × 140 × 135 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦152×134×125 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M: ⁦1.1 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: ⁦0.84 kg⁩); Supported OS (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M: Linux, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K: Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, macOS).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160M suits needs centered on Dimensions, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q809K fits priorities around سرعة الطباعة. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
$65.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp