Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300 within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Line Thermal Direct Line Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ ⁦80 mm⁩
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
سرعة الطباعة ⁦160 mm/s⁩ ⁦300 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution ⁦203 dpi⁩ ⁦203 dpi⁩
Input Buffer ⁦96 KB⁩ ⁦4096 KB⁩
Printing
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦1.5×3.0 mm (12×24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩ ⁦1.1×2.1 mm (9×17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦3.0×3.0 mm (24×24 dots)⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
GB18030 Character Set Support — Yes
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦180 × 142 × 130 mm⁩ ⁦183×143.5×135 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.1 kg⁩ ⁦1.3 kg⁩
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes —
Connectivity
Supported OS — Linux
Interface ⁦USB / Ethernet / USB + Ethernet / USB + 9-pin Serial / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi⁩ ⁦USB + Ethernet, USB + 25-pin Serial, USB + Parallel, USB + Ethernet + Bluetooth, USB + Ethernet + Wi-Fi, or Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩
Features
Error Alarm Support Yes Yes
Order Coming Alert Yes Yes
QR Code Printing — Yes
Logo Download and Printing — Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-A160H⁩ ⁦XP-Q300⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H if you need:

  • Weight: ⁦1.1 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.3 kg⁩

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300 if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦300 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦160 mm/s⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦4096 KB⁩ vs ⁦96 KB⁩
  • Interface: ⁦USB + Ethernet, USB + 25-pin Serial, USB + Parallel, USB + Ethernet + Bluetooth, USB + Ethernet + Wi-Fi, or Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩ vs ⁦USB / Ethernet / USB + Ethernet / USB + 9-pin Serial / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi⁩

Overall, the technical lean favors Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300 on سرعة الطباعة and Input Buffer. Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H remains the better pick if your priority is Weight. They share تقنية الطباعة and Media Width. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300 share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Media Width, Maximum Paper Roll Diameter.

The main decisive differences: سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦160 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300: ⁦300 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦96 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300: ⁦4096 KB⁩); Weight (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦1.1 kg⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300: ⁦1.3 kg⁩); Interface (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦USB / Ethernet / USB + Ethernet / USB + 9-pin Serial / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300: ⁦USB + Ethernet, USB + 25-pin Serial, USB + Parallel, USB + Ethernet + Bluetooth, USB + Ethernet + Wi-Fi, or Serial + USB + Ethernet⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H suits needs centered on Weight, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q300 fits priorities around سرعة الطباعة. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm⁩‎ - ‎⁨USB⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q80b-80mm
$35.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp