Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M

A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M within the same category.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M⁩
Price Not for sale Not for sale
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة Direct Line Thermal Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦80 mm⁩ ⁦80 mm⁩
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩
Print Width ⁦72 mm⁩ ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation — ESC/POS compatible
سرعة الطباعة ⁦160 mm/s⁩ ⁦200 mm/s⁩
Print Resolution ⁦203 dpi⁩ —
Input Buffer ⁦96 KB⁩ ⁦64 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity — ⁦576 dots/line or 512 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing ⁦3.75 mm⁩ ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing Yes Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩ ⁦Font A: 42 or 48 columns; Font B: 56 or 64 columns; Simplified/Traditional Chinese: 21 or 24 columns⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory ⁦256 KB⁩ ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦12×24 dots⁩
Font B Size ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩ ⁦9×17 dots⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩ ⁦24×24 dots⁩
Character Set ⁦PC347 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian-French), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩ ⁦PC437 (Standard Europe), Katakana, PC850 (Multilingual), PC860 (Portuguese), PC863 (Canadian), PC865 (Nordic), West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866 (Cyrillic #2), PC852 (Latin 2), PC858, Iran II, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩ ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, JAN13 (EAN13), JAN8 (EAN8), CODABAR, ITF, CODE39, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input ⁦AC 100–240 V, 50–60 Hz⁩ ⁦AC 110V/220V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Printer Input — ⁦DC 24V/2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V/1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions ⁦180 × 142 × 130 mm⁩ ⁦178×140×128 mm (D×W×H) mm⁩
Weight ⁦1.1 kg⁩ ⁦1.16 kg⁩
Body Material — ABS
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–45 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–80 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ 10–90 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Partial Auto Cutter Partial auto cutter
Cutter Life ⁦1500000 cuts⁩ ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦150 km⁩ ⁦100 km⁩
Intelligent Anti-paper-jam Cutter Yes Yes
Connectivity
Supported OS — ⁦Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10, Linux⁩
Interface ⁦USB / Ethernet / USB + Ethernet / USB + 9-pin Serial / USB + Bluetooth / USB + Wi-Fi⁩ USB + Serial
Certifications
Certifications — CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Features
Error Alarm Support Yes —
Order Coming Alert Yes —
QR Code Printing — Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-A160H⁩ ⁦XP-E200M⁩

Summary: Which Product Should You Choose?

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H if you need:

  • Media Width: ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ vs ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩
  • Input Buffer: ⁦96 KB⁩ vs ⁦64 KB⁩
  • Weight: ⁦1.1 kg⁩ vs ⁦1.16 kg⁩
  • Storage Humidity: ⁦10–90, non-condensing %⁩ vs 10–90 %

Choose Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M if you need:

  • سرعة الطباعة: ⁦200 mm/s⁩ vs ⁦160 mm/s⁩
  • Font A Size: ⁦12×24 dots⁩ vs ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩
  • Font B Size: ⁦9×17 dots⁩ vs ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩
  • Chinese Font Size: ⁦24×24 dots⁩ vs ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩

There is no clear technical winner between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M; the key decision axis is Media Width. They share تقنية الطباعة and Maximum Paper Roll Diameter. Review the choice points above, then confirm availability before buying.

What is the difference between Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M share a close technical baseline, notably تقنية الطباعة, Maximum Paper Roll Diameter, Paper Thickness.

The main decisive differences: Media Width (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦79.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦58 / 80 mm⁩); سرعة الطباعة (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦160 mm/s⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦200 mm/s⁩); Input Buffer (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦96 KB⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦64 KB⁩); Font A Size (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦12×24 dots⁩); Font B Size (Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H: ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M: ⁦9×17 dots⁩).

In practice, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-A160H suits needs centered on Media Width, while Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-E200M fits priorities around سرعة الطباعة. Review the specs table above before deciding.

Products from the same brand & category

View all
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm⁩‎ - ‎⁨USB⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-q80b-80mm
$35.00 in stock
⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-T58H⁩ thermal-printer-xprinter-xp-t58h
$28.00 in stock

Frequently asked questions — EvoLink

Contact via WhatsApp