Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM
Xprinter XP-76IIIM receipt printer, multiple interface options, 100 Mbps Ethernet, multi-copy invoice printing…
Not for sale
Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200
A full side-by-side comparison of reference models Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM and Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 within the same category.
Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200
Interface
Xprinter XP-Q200 thermal receipt printer, 200 mm/s, 80 mm paper, USB and Ethernet, Windows, Linux, Android and…
Not for sale
| Specification | Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM | Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Not for sale | Not for sale |
| Printer Specifications | ||
| تقنية الطباعة | Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin | Direct Thermal |
| Media Handling | ||
| Media Width | 75.5 ± 0.5 mm | 79.5±0.5 mm |
| Maximum Paper Roll Diameter | 80 mm | 80 mm |
| Paper Type | Plain / carbon copy paper | — |
| Print Width | 63.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Printer Emulation | EPSON ESC/POS compatible | — |
| سرعة الطباعة | 4.5 mm/s | 200 mm/s |
| Print Resolution | 203 dpi | 203 dpi |
| Input Buffer | — | 64 KB |
| Printing | ||
| Column Capacity | 400 dots/line | 576 dots/line or 512 dots/line |
| Line Spacing | 4.23 mm | 3.75 mm |
| Memory | ||
| NV Flash Memory | — | 256 KB |
| Power | ||
| Power Adapter Input | — | AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz |
| Power Adapter Output | — | DC 24V/2.5A |
| Printer Input | DC 24 V, 2.5 A | — |
| Cash Drawer Output | DC 24 V, 1 A | — |
| Physical | ||
| Dimensions | 205 × 180 × 135 mm (D × W × H) mm | 195×140×143 (D×W×H) mm |
| Weight | 1.56 kg | 1.1 kg |
| Environment | ||
| Operating Temperature | 0–45 °C | — |
| Operating Humidity | 10–80 % | — |
| Storage Temperature | -10–60 °C | — |
| Storage Humidity | 10–90 % | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Auto Cutter | Partial Cut | Partial auto cutter |
| Cutter Life | 1000000 cuts | — |
| Printhead Life | 10000000 lines | 150 lines |
| Connectivity | ||
| Supported OS | — | Windows, Linux, Android, iOS |
| Interface | Parallel / Serial / USB / LAN | USB + Ethernet |
| General | ||
| Model | XP-76IIIM | XP-Q200 |
| Fonts | ||
| GB18030 Character Set Support | Yes | — |
| Warranty | ||
| Manufacturer Warranty | — | 12 months |
Summary: which fits better?
Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM vs Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 — choose by media width, cutter, interfaces, and print speed in the same unit — do not rank printhead life across mixed units.
When to pick which:
Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM if you need: the simpler footprint shown in the table.
Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 if you need: media width that matches the POS role, clearer POS connectivity.
Key differences:
- Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5
- Interface: Parallel / Serial / USB / LAN vs USB + Ethernet
- Tkny Altbaaa: Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin vs Direct Thermal
- Aadd Alnkat Fy Alstr: 400 vs 576 dots/line or 512 dots/line
- Aard Altbaaa: 63.5 vs 72
Based on the specs table, Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 fits most office needs better thanks to: Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5; Interface: Parallel / Serial / USB / LAN vs USB + Ethernet; Weight: 1.56 vs 1.1.
Printhead life in lines versus km is not directly comparable.
What differs?
Material differences (most important first)
- Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5
- Interface: Parallel / Serial / USB / LAN vs USB + Ethernet
- Tkny Altbaaa: Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin vs Direct Thermal
- Aadd Alnkat Fy Alstr: 400 vs 576 dots/line or 512 dots/line
- Aard Altbaaa: 63.5 vs 72
- Model: XP-76IIIM vs XP-Q200
- Sraa Altbaaa: 4.5 vs 200
- Tbaaad Alastr: 4.23 vs 3.75
Not directly comparable (mixed units/technology)
- Printhead Life: 10000000 vs 150
Similarities
some shared core values in the table
Products from the same brand & category
View all
Frequently asked questions — EvoLink
Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76IIIM if you need: the simpler footprint shown in the table.
Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-Q200 if you need: media width that matches the POS role, clearer POS connectivity.
Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5
Not when units differ (lines vs km) or print technologies differ. Compare width, cutter, and interfaces first.