Compare Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76II+ Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm

A full side-by-side comparison of reference model Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76II+ and in-stock product Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B on specs, price, and Syria availability.

Specifications

Specification ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76II+⁩ ⁦Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm⁩
Price Not for sale $35.00
Printer Specifications
تقنية الطباعة ⁦Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin⁩ Direct Thermal
Media Handling
Media Width ⁦75.5 ± 0.5 mm⁩ ⁦79.5±0.5 mm⁩
Maximum Paper Roll Diameter ⁦65 mm⁩ —
Paper Type — Thermal Receipt Paper
Paper Thickness ⁦0.06–0.08 mm⁩ —
Print Width — ⁦72 mm⁩
Printer Emulation EPSON and STAR compatible ESC/POS
سرعة الطباعة ⁦4.5 lines/s mm/s⁩ ⁦230 mm/s⁩
Input Buffer ⁦45 bytes or 4 KB, selectable by DIP switches KB⁩ ⁦96 KB⁩
Printing
Column Capacity ⁦400 dots/line⁩ ⁦576 or 512 dots/line⁩
Line Spacing — ⁦3.75 mm⁩
Adjustable Line Spacing — Yes
Column Number ⁦Font A: 33 or 35 characters/line; Font B: 40 or 42 characters/line⁩ ⁦Font A: 42/48, Font B: 56/64, Chinese: 21/24⁩
Memory
NV Flash Memory — ⁦256 KB⁩
Fonts
Font A Size ⁦9 × 9 dots⁩ ⁦1.5 × 3.0 mm (12 × 24 dots)⁩
Font B Size ⁦7 × 9 dots⁩ ⁦1.1 × 2.1 mm (9 × 17 dots)⁩
Chinese Font Size ⁦16 × 16 dots⁩ ⁦3.0 × 3.0 mm (24 × 24 dots)⁩
Character Set — ⁦PC437, Katakana, PC850, PC860, PC863, PC865, West Europe, Greek, Hebrew, East Europe, Iran, WPC1252, PC866, PC852, PC858, IranII, Latvian, Arabic, PT151 (1251)⁩
Barcode Support
Supported 1D Barcodes — ⁦UPC-A, UPC-E, EAN13, EAN8, CODE39, ITF, CODABAR, CODE93, CODE128⁩
Supported 2D Barcodes — ⁦QR Code, PDF417⁩
Power
Power Adapter Input — ⁦AC 100–240V, 50–60Hz⁩
Power Adapter Output ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V / 2.5A⁩
Printer Input ⁦DC 24 V, 2.5 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V / 2.5A⁩
Cash Drawer Output ⁦DC 12–24 V, 1 A⁩ ⁦DC 24V / 1A⁩
Physical
Dimensions — ⁦180x145x130 mm⁩
Weight — ⁦0.8 kg⁩
Environment
Operating Temperature ⁦0–50 °C⁩ ⁦0–45 °C⁩
Operating Humidity 10–90 % 10–80 %
Storage Temperature ⁦-10–60 °C⁩ ⁦-10–60 °C⁩
Storage Humidity 10–90 % 10–90 %
Reliability
Auto Cutter Tear-away cutter Partial Cut
Cutter Life — ⁦1500000 cuts⁩
Printhead Life ⁦10,000,000 lines km⁩ ⁦150 km⁩
Connectivity
Supported OS ⁦Windows 9X, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows 2003, Windows NT, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7⁩ Windows, Linux, macOS, Android
Interface Serial / Parallel / USB / LAN USB
Certifications
Certifications — CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
Features
Error Alarm Support — Yes
General
Model ⁦XP-76II+⁩ —
Warranty
Manufacturer Warranty ⁦12 months⁩ —

Summary: which fits better?

Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76II+ vs Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm — choose by media width, cutter, interfaces, and print speed in the same unit — do not rank printhead life across mixed units.

research reference (not for sale) vs store product.

When to pick which:

Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter XP-76II+ if you need: clearer POS connectivity.

Pick Thermal Printer Xprinter Q80B - 80mm if you need: media width that matches the POS role.

Key differences:

  • Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5
  • Interface: USB, LAN, Serial, Parallel vs USB
  • Tkny Altbaaa: Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin vs Direct thermal
  • Printhead Life: 10,000,000 lines vs 150
  • Aadd Alnkat Fy Alstr: 400 vs 576 or 512

No single overall winner — choose by priority. Top table gaps: Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5; Interface: USB, LAN, Serial, Parallel vs USB; Tkny Altbaaa: Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin vs Direct thermal.

Printhead life in lines versus km is not directly comparable.

What differs?

Material differences (most important first)

  • Media Width: 75.5 ± 0.5 vs 79.5±0.5
  • Interface: USB, LAN, Serial, Parallel vs USB
  • Tkny Altbaaa: Impact Dot Matrix – 9 Pin vs Direct thermal
  • Printhead Life: 10,000,000 lines vs 150
  • Aadd Alnkat Fy Alstr: 400 vs 576 or 512
  • Aard Altbaaa: 63.5 vs 72
  • Certifications: CE, FCC, CCC, RoHS vs CCC, CB, CE, FCC, RoHS
  • Column Number: Font A: 33 or 35 characters/line; Font B: 40 or 42 characters/line vs Font A: 42/48, Font B: 56/64, Chinese: 21/24

Minor deltas

  • Operating Humidity: 10–90 vs 10–80

Similarities

some shared core values in the table

Frequently asked questions

Contact via WhatsApp